API Gateway Migration
Migrated 50+ microservices to a unified API gateway, reducing latency by 40% and improving developer experience
Overview
Led the migration from a legacy API gateway to a modern, high-performance solution that serves as the single entry point for all client requests
Problem
Our homegrown API gateway was becoming a bottleneck. It added 200-300ms of latency to every request, had limited observability, and required custom code for every new feature.
Constraints
- Cannot break existing client integrations
- Must migrate 50+ services without downtime
- Limited budget for commercial solutions
- 6-week timeline
Approach
Evaluated open-source and commercial API gateways, selected Kong for its performance and extensibility. Implemented a phased rollout using traffic splitting to gradually migrate services while monitoring for issues.
Key Decisions
Use Kong over AWS API Gateway
Kong offers better performance, more flexibility, and avoids vendor lock-in. Self-hosting gives us full control over configuration and costs.
- AWS API Gateway
- Nginx with custom Lua scripts
- Envoy Proxy
Implement gradual traffic shifting with feature flags
Allows us to test each service migration in production with real traffic before fully committing. Can instantly rollback if issues arise.
Tech Stack
- Kong
- Lua
- PostgreSQL
- Prometheus
- Grafana
- Kubernetes
Result & Impact
The new gateway has become a platform for cross-cutting concerns like rate limiting, authentication, and observability. Developer velocity has increased significantly.
Learnings
- Traffic splitting is essential for safe migrations at scale
- Investing in observability before migration pays off immediately
- Plugin-based architecture makes it easy to add new capabilities
Migration Strategy
The phased rollout was critical to success. We started with low-traffic internal services to validate the approach, then gradually moved to higher-traffic customer-facing services.
Each service migration followed a checklist: update routing rules, enable traffic splitting at 1%, monitor for 24 hours, increase to 10%, 50%, then 100%. This gave us confidence at each step.